Strict Standards: Declaration of action_plugin_brcgeneral_abstract::register() should be compatible with DokuWiki_Action_Plugin::register($controller) in /storage/content/43/1009243/governwisely.org/public_html/lib/plugins/brcgeneral/action/abstract.php on line 11 Liberty University, Inc. et al. v. Geithner et al. - Govern Wisely

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

ppaca:vawd6-2010-cv-00015:zzqpmain [2010/09/01 03:49]
zachn Added revised scheduling order
ppaca:vawd6-2010-cv-00015:zzqpmain [2010/09/23 23:34] (current)
zachn Added Reply Brief
Line 2: Line 2:
 <abstract Docket and commentary regarding Liberty University et al. v. Geithner et al., litigation challenging the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA, "Obamacare") in the Federal District Court for the Western District of Virginia.> <abstract Docket and commentary regarding Liberty University et al. v. Geithner et al., litigation challenging the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA, "Obamacare") in the Federal District Court for the Western District of Virginia.>
 <keywords Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, PPACA, Obamacare, Liberty University, Geithner, Sebelius, Solis, Holder, Western District of Virginia> <keywords Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, PPACA, Obamacare, Liberty University, Geithner, Sebelius, Solis, Holder, Western District of Virginia>
 + 
 On March 23, 2010, Plaintiff Liberty University, with others, commenced civil litigation naming Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, and others, as Defendants. The case, #6:10-cv-15, is classified as a civil rights case and challenges the constitutionality of a state statute which purports to nullify certain provisions of the [[..:zzqpmain]] (PPACA). The case is assigned to Judge Norman Moon. On March 23, 2010, Plaintiff Liberty University, with others, commenced civil litigation naming Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, and others, as Defendants. The case, #6:10-cv-15, is classified as a civil rights case and challenges the constitutionality of a state statute which purports to nullify certain provisions of the [[..:zzqpmain]] (PPACA). The case is assigned to Judge Norman Moon.
  
Line 11: Line 11:
 The Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is pending. The Plaintiffs must file a responsive brief by 3-Sep-2010 (the same a brief is due in the Eastern District case) and the Defendants may file a responsive brief on or before 15-Sep-2010. Discovery is stayed pending outcome of motion to dismiss; however, discovery is anticipated, due in part to the nature of some claims asserted by Plaintiffs (and denied by Defendants): the need for discovery suggests that some claims are note merely matters of law, suggesting that in some instances the Court will function as a finder of fact. The Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is pending. The Plaintiffs must file a responsive brief by 3-Sep-2010 (the same a brief is due in the Eastern District case) and the Defendants may file a responsive brief on or before 15-Sep-2010. Discovery is stayed pending outcome of motion to dismiss; however, discovery is anticipated, due in part to the nature of some claims asserted by Plaintiffs (and denied by Defendants): the need for discovery suggests that some claims are note merely matters of law, suggesting that in some instances the Court will function as a finder of fact.
  
-===== Docket ===== +===== Case Materials =====
- +
-The docket for this case was last retrieved via [[https://ecf.vawd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/login.pl|PACER]] and reviewed on 18-Aug-2010. Routine procedural items are listed but are not archived.+
  
   * {{di0001.pdf|Item 01}} - [[0001|Plaintiffs' Complaint]]   * {{di0001.pdf|Item 01}} - [[0001|Plaintiffs' Complaint]]
Line 25: Line 23:
   * {{di0029.pdf|Item 29}} - Order Setting Schedule and Procedures for Trial   * {{di0029.pdf|Item 29}} - Order Setting Schedule and Procedures for Trial
   * {{di0031.pdf|Item 31}} - Revised Order Setting Schedule and Procedures   * {{di0031.pdf|Item 31}} - Revised Order Setting Schedule and Procedures
 +  * {{di0032.pdf|Item 32}} - Plaintiffs' Brief in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss
 +  * {{di0034.pdf|Item 34}} - Order setting schedule: Plaintiffs' Reply Brief Now Due 22-Sep-2010
 +  * {{di0035.pdf|Item 35}} - Notice of Hearing (Re: Motion to Dismiss; 22-Oct-2010, 10:00 AM, Lynchburg)
 +  * {{di0036.pdf|Item 36}} - Defendants' Reply to Plaintiffs' Brief in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss
 +
 +===== Docket Reports =====
  
 The following docket reports are available: The following docket reports are available:
 +
   * {{docket-pc-20100415.pdf|2010-04-15}}   * {{docket-pc-20100415.pdf|2010-04-15}}
   * {{docket-20100708.pdf|2010-07-08}}   * {{docket-20100708.pdf|2010-07-08}}
Line 32: Line 37:
   * {{docket-20100730.pdf|2010-07-30}}   * {{docket-20100730.pdf|2010-07-30}}
   * {{docket-20100813.pdf|2010-08-13}}   * {{docket-20100813.pdf|2010-08-13}}
-  * {{docket-20100831.pdf|2010-08-31}}, items through 31+  * {{docket-20100831.pdf|2010-08-31}} 
 +  * {{docket-20100903.pdf|2010-09-03}} 
 +  * {{docket-20100912.pdf|2010-09-12}} 
 +  * {{docket-20100921.pdf|2010-09-21}} 
 +  * {{docket-20100922.pdf|2010-09-22}}, items through 35